I’ve been digging into architecture firm financials for the past six months. What I found doesn’t make sense.
30% of firms are struggling with profitability. Simultaneously, 67% plan to increase headcount. And here’s the kicker – 53% are turning down profitable work because they can’t staff it.
I had to read those numbers three times. We’re drowning and dying of thirst at the same time.
Last month, I sat across from a principal who runs a 75-person firm. Good work. Smart people. Strong reputation. He looked exhausted.
“Craig, we just passed on a $3.2M healthcare project—perfect fit for us. But my senior healthcare person is already on four projects. If I stretch her any thinner, we’ll start making mistakes. Can’t afford that.”
I asked the obvious: “Why not hire another senior healthcare expert?”
He laughed. “With what money? And where would I find them? Everyone good is taken or costs more than I can afford.”
This conversation happened three times that week. Different firms. Same paradox.
Here’s what I started mapping out after those conversations:
Your senior principal – let’s call her Jane – bills at $250/hour. She’s overseeing six projects because no one else has her 30 years of healthcare experience. Each project needs maybe 20% of her time. That’s 120% of a human being.
So projects slow down. Junior staff wait for her input. Some make preventable mistakes. Deadlines slip. Clients notice.
Meanwhile, you’re chasing three major healthcare RFPs. Each one needs Jane’s deep involvement to win. She’s already working weekends.
The traditional solution? Clone Jane. Good luck with that.
I was skeptical when a colleague told me about a firm in Seattle that solved this exact problem without hiring anyone. “They scaled their expertise, not their headcount,” he said.
That phrase stuck with me. How do you scale expertise?
So I flew out to see for myself. What I witnessed challenged everything I thought I knew about professional services.
They’d created what they called a “digital twin” of their healthcare principal. Not a chatbot. Not a knowledge base. Something that could review projects, answer complex questions, and guide junior staff – all in the principal’s voice, with her judgment patterns.
“Watch this,” the operations director said. She pulled up a message from a project architect: “Client wants to reduce the OR prep area by 15%. Concerned about workflow impact. Thoughts?”
The digital twin’s response was immediate and sophisticated. It didn’t just cite code requirements. It explained the workflow implications, suggested alternative space-saving approaches, and even referenced a similar challenge from a project three years ago.
“Is your healthcare principal reviewing these?” I asked.
“She’s in Cabo this week,” came the reply. “First real vacation in two years.”
I’ve now studied seven firms using this approach. The results are consistent and, frankly, stunning:
However, what caught my attention was the quality improvement. When expertise is always available, standards stay high. When seniors aren’t burnt out, innovation happens.
One firm showed me their financials. 15% profitability improvement in six months. Not from cutting costs. From eliminating the bottlenecks that were constraining revenue.
During my research, I started asking firm leaders a simple question: “Where does expertise get stuck in your firm?”
The answers were immediate and painful:
Every one of these is a point where projects wait for smart people who are stretched too thin. Each delay cascades. Death by a thousand small waits.
But what if expertise never had to wait? What if it was always available, infinitely scalable, never tired?
That’s not a hypothetical anymore. I’m watching it happen.
Here’s what I want you to do this week: Track every time a project or decision waits for expert input. Use a simple spreadsheet. Note the expert needed, the question asked, and the delay caused.
I did this exercise with three firms. The average? 47 expertise bottlenecks per week. At an average delay of 4 hours each, that’s 188 hours of project slowdown. Weekly.
Now multiply that by your billing rates. Add the opportunity cost of delayed completions. Factor in the projects you couldn’t take.
That number you’re looking at? That’s the cost of expertise that doesn’t scale.
I believe we’re witnessing the most significant transformation in professional services since CAD replaced hand-drafting. But this isn’t about replacing humans. It’s about amplifying them.
The firms implementing this now aren’t just solving today’s profitability crisis. They’re building infrastructure for a fundamentally different future. One where expertise flows freely, where capacity isn’t constrained by headcount, where the best thinking is always available.
The 30% profitability crisis isn’t going to resolve itself on its own. Traditional solutions aren’t working. But I’m seeing a new path forward, and it’s more accessible than most people realize.
I’m curious: What’s the biggest expertise bottleneck in your firm right now? Where does important work sit, waiting for smart people who are overwhelmed?
I’m collecting patterns, and what I’m learning is reshaping my perspective on the future of practice.
Next week, I’ll share something that might be harder to hear – why your best people are already leaving, even if they don’t know it yet. The implications for succession planning are profound.
After four decades of watching firms struggle with the same constraints, I’m finally seeing breakthrough solutions. Not from where I expected – not better project management or new delivery methods. From reimagining expertise itself. If you’re wrestling with the profitability paradox, let’s talk. The patterns I’m seeing point to solutions that actually work.
Connect with me to discover how custom, secure, and agentic AI solutions can transform your practice.
Share this post:
Strategic alignment creates a clear sense of direction and purpose and provides a foundation for growth and success.
The key to success is a commitment to an inspirational, innovative, and integral practice that provides value to your clients through vision, brand alignment, and leadership.
